A violation of law is any act (or, less commonly, omission) that does not comply with applicable law. Violations typically include both crime and civil injustice. Certain acts, such as fraud, may violate civil and criminal law. In law, an injustice can be a violation of the law, i.e. any damage resulting from a violation of a statutory right. A legal injustice can also mean that the condition violates the principles of justice or law. It means that something contradicts conscience or morality and causes others to be treated unfairly. If the damage caused by an injustice is sufficiently small, there is no compensation, which is known as de minimis non curat lex. Failure to do so will result in damages. An injury; a misdemeanor; a violation of the law or law. The idea of rights, of course, suggests the correlative idea of injustice; Because all rights can be violated. A demand for payment for goods sold implies (for example) an injustice on the part of the person who owes but retains the price; an impersonal right to security, an injustice on the part of those who commit personal violence.

And while the law is generally about establishing and enforcing rights, on closer inspection, we see that it has to do with right and wrong. It first defines the nature and definition of rights and then, with a view to their real security, proceeds to define injustice and develop ways to prevent or remedy it. 1 Steph. Comm. 126. When we talk about injustice, we must understand the following three important Latin maxims: The idea of right suggests the opposite idea of injustice, because any right can be violated. For example, the right to receive payment for goods sold implies injustice on the part of the person who owes but makes no payment. In the broadest sense, the law aims to establish and preserve rights, but in its day-to-day application, the law must deal with right and wrong. The law first establishes the nature and definition of rights, and then attempts to guarantee those rights by defining injustice and developing ways to prevent or redress injustice. An injustice (from Old English wrang – “crooked”)[1] is an illegal or immoral act. [2] Legal errors are usually defined fairly clearly in the law of a state and/or jurisdiction. They can be divided into civil injustice and crimes (or crimes) in common law countries,[2] while civil law countries tend to have additional categories, such as violations.

A private injustice, also called civil injustice, is a violation of public or private rights that violates a person and is therefore subject to civil law or compensation. A civil wrong, which is not based on a breach of contract, is a tort. The tort includes bodily harm, assault, defamation, intentional infliction of psychological distress and property damage. The same act or omission that constitutes a tort may also constitute a breach of contract, but negligence, not breach of contract, is the tort. For example, if a lawyer represents his client negligently, the lawyer may be sued for both misconduct, which is tortious, and breach of the lawyer`s contract. Legal fault means an act that is legally reprehensible and violates the rule of legal justice and violates the law. Therefore, a legal injustice is an injustice that arises from the violation, contempt or contempt of a legal right. Without a violation, there can be no cause of action.

There can be no legal fault unless there is a violation of a corresponding legal claim. Legally evil is one who violates the prescribed law. The violation of a legal right is always wrong, it is a violation of legal norms for just and correct conduct English law recognized the concept of “injustice” before recognizing the distinction between civil injustice (governed by civil law) and crime (defined by criminal law), this distinction was developed during the thirteenth century. [3] An injury; The tort is an infringement. In its most ordinary sense, false means an infringement of the person or property of another person or his rights relating to the contract unrelated to the contract; And this injustice is committed with or without violence. But in a broader sense, false includes breach of contract; A person`s failure to comply with his or her obligation or promise is an injustice or violation of the person to whom it was made. FALSE. An injury; (see below) a misdemeanor (see below) an infringement. In its most ordinary sense, false means an infringement of the person or property of another person or his rights relating to the contract unrelated to the contract; And this injustice is committed with or without violence. But in a broader sense, false includes breach of contract; A person`s failure to comply with his or her obligation or promise is an injustice or violation of the person to whom it was made. 3 Bl.

Komm. 158. 2. Injustice is divided into public and private injustice. 1. A public injustice is an act that harms the general public, commonly referred to as crimes, misdemeanours or misdemeanors, and is punishable in various ways, such as indictment, summary proceedings and, in the case of a death sentence, imprisonment, fine, etc. 2. Private injustice, which is harm to individuals that does not affect the public: These are redressed by claims for damages, &c. False means that something does not correspond to the expected results that we, as a person or group, have set for something.

There are two types of injustice, namely legal injustice and moral injustice. Legal fault means an act that is legally reprehensible and violates the rule of legal justice and violates the law. Morally evil means that it is a morally or naturally wrong action and contradicts the rule of natural justice. Legal injustice can be divided into criminal injustice and civil injustice. Injustice that goes against the good of the public and the state is called criminal injustice, while injustice that affects the interests of a particular individual is called civil injustice. The maxim refers to actual damage without violation of a legal claim. Damnum sine injuria means actual damage suffered without legal damage. In this case, the mere fact of damage does not mean that there has been a violation, i.e. violation of legal rights. There are many actions that are not illegal in the eyes of the law. Damages can take the form of money, service, physical injury, loss of health or reputation, and loss of comfort. According to this maxim, these are simple damages without violation of legal rights.

A simple damage, however important it may be, without prejudice to a legal action, does not give rise to an action. In Ashby v. White, (1703) 2 Raym Ld. 938, Ashby (the plaintiff) voted in the general election. The election official in the voting booth, named White (the respondent), refused to record the applicant`s vote. The applicant was a lawful citizen of the electoral district and was entitled to vote. The vote cast by the applicant was in favour of the winner of the election. The applicant filed an application on the basis that his vote as an elector was not recorded. Therefore, he should receive compensation from the defendant. The respondent`s objection was that the plaintiff`s unregistered vote was in favour of the winner of the election and that, therefore, no damage (damage) had been caused. The court ruled that the vote cast by the plaintiff was in favour of the winner of the election.

Thus, there is no actual harm to the plaintiff, but his legal right to choose was violated by the defendant. Denying an elector to register his or her vote is an injustice in civil law and, therefore, the applicant is entitled to a judicial remedy. The doctrine of injuria sine damnum prevailed and the plaintiff was offered compensation.